MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995772591 · doi:10.1111/rec.13110

Immediate response of fish communities and water chemistry to causeway breaching and bridge installation in the Kaouk River estuary, British Columbia, Canada

2019· article· en· W2995772591 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Travis G. Gerwing, Elmar Plate, Jess Kidd, Jesse A. Sinclair, Christopher W. Burns, Shane Johnson, Steven Roias, Cameron McCulloch, Robert C. Bocking

Bibliographic record

VenueRestoration Ecology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsASL Environmental Sciences (Canada)University of Victoria
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsEstuaryFish <Actinopterygii>Bridge (graph theory)FisheryEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)ArchaeologyGeographyGeologyBiologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kaouk River estuary is located on the northwest coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada, in the Treaty Settlement Lands of the Ka:'yu:'k't'h'/Che:k'tles7et'h First Nations. Stretching across the widest point of this estuary is a causeway providing road access to Fair Harbour. This causeway was observed to decrease habitat connectivity throughout the estuary, specifically limiting juvenile salmon access to high‐quality rearing habitat in the tidal marsh. As such, the causeway was breached in 2019 and a bridge was installed. Juvenile salmon were observed using the new connection and were captured both up and downstream of the causeway immediately following breaching. Postbreach water chemistry (dissolved oxygen, pH, salinity, and temperature) near the causeway was recorded within the range of values observed throughout the estuary. Use of the breach by juvenile salmon and homogenized water chemistry indicate the project succeeded in improving habitat connectivity within the Kaouk River estuary and has enhanced juvenile salmon access to 2.7 km2 of wetland rearing habitat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRestoration EcologySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207