MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995788176

New minerals approved in 2002 and nomenclature modifications approved 1998–2002 by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names, International Mineralogical Association

2003· article· en· W2995788176 on OpenAlexaff
Joel D. Grice, Giovanni Ferraris

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclinic crystal systemMineralCrystallographyCrystal structureChemistryHexagonal crystal systemPowder diffractionPleochroismMineralogyOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The information given here is provided by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names, I. M. A. for comparative purposes and as a service to mineralogists working on new species. Each mineral is described in the following format: IMA No. Chemical Formula (any relationship to other minerals; structure analysis) Crystal system, space group unit-cell parameters Color; luster; diaphaneity Optical properties Strongest lines in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern The names of these approved species are considered confidential information until the authors have published their descriptions or released information themselves. No other information will be released by the commission. IMA No. 2002–001 (Ce,La,Nd,Ba)(Fe3+,Al)3[(As,Al)O4]2(OH)6 Fe-dominant analogue of arsenoflorencite-(Ce) Trigonal: R 3 m a 7.260, c 16.77 A Light-green to brownish; resinous; transparent Uniaxial(-), mean refractive index = 1.97 5.906(25), 3.636(40), 3.052(100), 2.792(30), 2.239(35), 1.817(35) IMA No. 2002–002 (□,K)1(Mg,Fe2+)3Fe3+2 [Si12O30] Milarite group; structure determined Hexagonal: P 6/ mcc a 10.050, c 14.338 A Deep blue to yellowish-green; vitreous; translucent Uniaxial (-), ω 1.589, e 1.586 8.70(97), 7.17(100), 5.535(96), 5.026(61), 4.352(53), 3.207(85) IMA No. 2002–003 NaSrKZn(Ti,Nb)4(Si4O12)2(O,OH)4•7H2O Labuntsovite group; structure determined Monoclinic: Cm a 14.495, b 13.945, c 7.838 A, β 117.75° White, pale-brown; vitreous; translucent to transparent Biaxial (+), α 1.680, β 1.687, γ 1.787, 2V(meas.) 25°, 2V(calc.) 31° 6.96(100), 3.21(80), 3.11(90), 2.60(35), 2.50(40), 1.74(30), 1.70(40) IMA No. 2002–004 CoSO4•H2O Kieserite group Monoclinic: C2/ c a 6.980, b 7.588, c 7.639 A, β 118.65° Pink; powdery; transparent Biaxial (+), n ~ 1.65 (calc.) 4.83(33), 3.405(100), 3.339(34), 3.291(32), 3.062(56), 2.567(30), 2.513(49) IMA No. 2002–005 (K,Ba,Na)2(Ti,Nb)2(Si4O12)(OH,O)2•3H2O …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.087

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207