Hydrocarbon generation and expulsion features of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation source rocks and their controlling effects on hydrocarbon accumulation in the Sichuan Basin, Central China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the features of the hydrocarbon generation and expulsion of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation (T 3 x) source rocks is important to properly guide petroleum exploration in the Xujiahe Formation in the Sichuan Basin. Based on mass balance, the hydrocarbon generation and expulsion from the T 3 x source rocks are characterized in this paper through a method (i.e., hydrocarbon generation potential index using pyrolysis data) different from that used in previous studies. The threshold and peak of hydrocarbon expulsion are determined to be R o = 0.9% and 1.15%, respectively. The amounts of hydrocarbon generated and expelled in the T 3 x source rocks are 4,525.5 × 10 8 and 2,420.5 × 10 8 t, respectively. Moreover, three hydrocarbon expulsion regions T 3 x have been identified in the Sichuan Basin. On the basis of the hydrocarbon generation and expulsion features of the source rocks and the distribution of the oil‐and‐gas reservoirs, the quantitative model of the hydrocarbon accumulation probability under the control of the T 3 x source rock is established via single‐factor regression analysis. The predictions obtained through this analysis show that the favourable oil‐and‐gas exploration areas in the Xujiahe Formation are distributed in the Qionglai, Chengdu, and Deyang regions, as well as in the west of Yilong region. Further, the results show that 78% of the discovered oil‐and‐gas reservoirs are located in the predicted favourable and relatively favourable oil‐and‐gas exploration areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it