MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995908482 · doi:10.9734/ejnfs/2015/20919

Addition of Zinc to Soaking Water during Parboiling Increases the Zinc Content of Bangladeshi Rice

2015· article· en· W2995908482 on OpenAlexaff
Christine Hotz, Kandakar Kabir, Sharifa S. Dipti, Joanne E Arsenault, Moniruzzaman Bipul

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Canadian institutionsNutriAg (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZincParboilingChemistryFood scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: In Bangladesh, zinc deficiency affects 45% of preschool children and 57% of women. As zinc deficiency is linked to child growth stunting, diarrheal disease, pneumonia, and increased risk of child mortality, large-scale programs for its prevention are required. Most rice produced in Bangladesh is parboiled and this presents a technical opportunity to increase rice zinc content by adding zinc during soaking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the increase in zinc content achievable by this strategy in milled Bangladeshi rice using local parboiling conditions, and its potential effect on adequacy of zinc intakes. Methods: A major local rice variety (BR29) and zinc sulfate were used. Paddy was steamed for 2 minutes, soaked in distilled, deionized water for 9 hours with addition of 0, 100, 150, 200, or 300 mg zinc/kg paddy. Drained paddy was steamed in a pressurized autoclave before drying and milling. Zinc content was determined by X-Ray Fluorescence. Results: Rice zinc content was 12.3, 16.0, 16.7, 21.6, and 23.6 mg/kg dry weight, respectively, where the highest level represents a 92% increase over the control. Using existing dietary intake Conference

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Nutrition & Food SafetySame topicRice Cultivation and Yield ImprovementFrench-language works237,207