Scapholunate Ligament Injury and the Effect of Scaphoid Lengthening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective We hypothesized that lengthening the scaphoid in a model of scapholunate ligament injury (SLI) will result in correction of radiographic markers of dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI) deformity. Materials and Methods An SLI with DISI deformity was created by sectioning the SL ligament, the palmar radiocarpal ligaments, and scapho-trapezio-trapezoid ligaments of a cadaveric upper extremity (n = 5). The wrist was radiographed in both anteroposterior and lateral planes to confirm creation of SLI and DISI. The scaphoid was then osteotomized at its waist. A series of grafts (1–8 mm) were then placed at the osteotomy site. Radiographs were completed at each length. The main outcome measures were scapholunate interval (SL, mm), scapholunate angle (SLA, degrees), and radiolunate angle (RLA, degrees). These values, measured following the insertion of varying graft lengths, were compared with baseline measurements taken “post-injury” status. Results The ability to create an SLI with DISI was confirmed in the postinjury group with a statistically significant change in RLA, SLA, and SL compared with preinjury. With osteotomy and progressive insertion of spacers, the values improved into the accepted normal ranges for RLA (6 mm) and SLA (4 mm) with scaphoid lengthening. Conclusions In this cadaveric model of SL injury, radiographic markers of DISI were returned to within normal ranges with scaphoid osteotomy and lengthening. Clinical Relevance The results of this study add insight into wrist kinematics in our injury model and may represent a potential future direction for surgical treatment of SLI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".