MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Dialectic of Individual and World System: Chen Yingzhen's Move from Existentialism to Marxism

2019· other· en· W2995977573 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Lupke

Bibliographic record

VenueA Companion to World Literature · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJapanese History and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExistentialismMarxist philosophyDialecticSociologyPoliticsCapitalismUnderclassModernityImprisonmentLiteratureAestheticsHistoryLawPolitical scienceEpistemologyPhilosophyArtAnthropologyCriminology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chen Yingzhen (1937–2016) is one of the most unique figures in modern Chinese and Taiwanese literature. A so‐called “native” Taiwanese of Southern Min heritage, Chen's writing is devoted to the depiction of the local, the ordinary, and in many cases the underclass. Yet unlike other Taiwanese, Chen was dedicated to a Marxist interpretation of Taiwan as a cog in the global system. He boldly courted ostracism from his contemporaries, refusing to join the Taiwan separatist movement. Chen began writing short stories in 1960, first on existential themes, then increasingly as critiques of global capitalism and political oppression. Chen was sentenced to life in imprisonment in 1967, but the sentence was later commuted and he was released in 1975. The key to understanding Chen's literary and critical thinking, and his status as a writer of world literature, is the dialectical nature of his writing: committed to depictions of his own local culture, he nevertheless viewed the conflicts and antagonisms within it as locked in a Manichean struggle with the global forces of economic modernity. One of his other great achievements was publishing the journal Renjian (1985–1989), which through reportage, essay journalism, and photojournalism sought to expose various forms of exploitation in Taiwan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueA Companion to World LiteratureSame topicJapanese History and CultureFrench-language works237,207