MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995979965 · doi:10.4000/books.cths.6362

The Llonin Cave (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias, Spain), level III (Galería): techno-typological characterisation of the Badegoulian lithic and bone assemblages

2019· book-chapter· en· W2995979965 on OpenAlexaff
Marco de la Rasilla Vives, Elsa Duarte Matías, J. Emili Aura Tortosa, Alfred Sanchis Serra, Yolanda Carrión Marco, Manuel Pérez Ripoll, Vicente Rodríguez Otero

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Montagne
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagdalenianCaveArchaeologyGeographyGeologyBlade (archaeology)BiotopeFaunaMiddenRock shelterDebitageEcologyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Llonin cave is located in the Cares river valley, between the sea and the Cantabrian Cordillera. In level III, hunted fauna comes from a rocky and mountainous biotope with chamois predominance over red deer and Spanish ibex. On top of this level there is an Upper Magdalenian level (II) and underneath an Upper Solutrean one (IV). Level III is formed by materials linked to fire, with a specific functionality, and there is an extraordinary association of elements: raclettes, single-beveled points (Placard type) and “pseudoexcisa” decoration. In addition, the substrate tools dominate, beginning with the splintered pieces, which are the best represented, both in quartzite and flint, followed by notches and denticulates in quartzite. Flakes are the priority blanks; blade production is low and bladelets are scarce. Actually the archaeological record is not related to the Cantabrian Solutrean or the Magdalenian, but agrees with the Badegoulian. The level has been dated ~18.000 BP (21584–21935 cal BP).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques eBooksSame topicPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207