Liquid Sloshing in a Rigid Cylindrical Tank Equipped with a Rigid Annular Baffle and on Soil Foundation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluid sloshing in a rigid circular cylindrical tank is investigated; the tank is resting on soil foundation and is excited by horizontal seismic accelerations. A rigid annular baffle is connected to the inner wall of the storage tank to reduce liquid sloshing. By using the fluid subdomain method, the convective velocity potential is derived. An equivalent model with mass-spring oscillators is proposed to describe the sloshing motions of the contained liquid. Then, by means of the least square method, a complex polynomial fraction is employed to fit the dynamic impedance of the soil. A nested lumped parameter model is established to model the effect of the soil foundation. The substructure method allows to obtain the soil–tank–liquid coupled model. The equation of motion of the coupled system is solved by the Newmark-[Formula: see text] method. A comparison between the present sloshing results and those published in the literature shows an excellent agreement. The effects of the soil parameters, the baffle position and its size on the dynamic behavior of the soil–tank–liquid system are discussed in detail. The results demonstrate that the soil properties and the baffle parameters can have a remarkable influence on liquid sloshing. The novelty of this research is that an analytical model for the soil–tank–liquid–baffle coupled system is derived for the first time and it allows to study the dynamics and sloshing response of the system with accuracy and low computational cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it