MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996100145 · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.001

Climate change policies and agendas: Facing implementation challenges and guiding responses

2019· article· en· W2996100145 on OpenAlexaff
Fátima Alvés, Walter Leal Filho, Paula Casaleiro, Gustavo J. Nagy, Harry Diaz, Abul Quasem Al‐Amin, José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra, Margot Hurlbert, Harith Farooq, Māris Kļaviņš, Mustafa Saroar, Eliška Krkoška Lorencová, Suresh Jain, Amadeu M.V.M. Soares, Fernando Morgado, Paul O’Hare, Franziska Wolf, Ulisses M. Azeiteiro

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Policy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Regina
FundersCentro de Estudos Ambientais e Marinhos, Universidade de AveiroMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino SuperiorFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUniversidade de CoimbraFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa CatarinaMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyResearch Councils UKNewton Fund
KeywordsVulnerability (computing)Climate changeAdaptation (eye)Socioeconomic statusEnvironmental resource managementBusinessEnvironmental planningDeveloping countryPolitical scienceSocioeconomic developmentEconomic growthGeographyEconomicsSociologyPopulationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.103
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.119
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1030.119
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0130.023
Scholarly communication0.0430.028
Open science0.0060.017
Research integrity0.0360.033
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.194
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & PolicySame topicClimate Change, Adaptation, MigrationFrench-language works237,207