Through-the-coating writing of tilted fiber Bragg gratings with the phase mask technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tilted fiber Bragg gratings are inscribed in non-photosensitized single mode fibers through the polyimide coating using a femtosecond infrared laser and a phase mask. The inscription technique used is based on simultaneously translating the fiber along its axis and the focusing cylindrical lens in the orthogonal direction by means of piezoelectric actuators. The grating plane tilt angles up to 10.3° are achieved with a 1.07 µm-pitch phase mask. The cladding modes reach ∼5 dB in strength in transmission despite the presence of the polyimide coating. The effectiveness of the fabricated tilted fiber Bragg gratings for refractive index sensing through the polyimide coating is also demonstrated. Additionally, we show that the classical approach for the inscription of tilted Bragg gratings, which is based on simply tilting the fiber with respect to the interference fringes, cannot be used in tight focusing geometries that are necessary for through-the-coating inscription.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".