Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Modernism is the first truly global literary movement in history and thus difficult to encapsulate in ideological or stylistic terms. Throughout the world, foundations of thought and aesthetics were undermined in the late nineteenth century. As a result, in places as far flung as France, Germany, and Great Britain on the one hand, and Japan, China, and Taiwan in East Asia on the other, as well as in Eastern Europe, Latin America, South Asia, and the Middle East, emerging writers everywhere were overturning received forms, contesting received notions of epistemology and morality, and creating poetry anew. In continental Europe, Nietzsche and Kierkegaard leveled devastating critiques upon state religion, metaphysics, and moral philosophy. The implications of this radical philosophical and religious break from established thinking reverberated through literary circles. In Japan, Masaoka Shiki and Yosano Akiko revamped haiku andtanka. In England and the United States, poets rewrote the rulebook for what constituted imagery and prosodic structures. In Chinese, traditional structures such as “regulated verse”shipoetry andcilyrics were largely shunted aside in favor of free verse. These changes came in response to rapid industrialization and urbanization, innovations that made communication around the globe much quicker and easier, and sentiments of alienation and exile throughout the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".