Survey of imazethapyr-resistant common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) in Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) is widespread in soybean ( Glycine max L.) fields in southern Québec. Biotypes resistant to ALS (group 2) herbicides are commonly reported in conventional crops where these herbicides are used. Reported cases are voluntary and potentially underestimate the occurrence of resistance. A survey was therefore undertaken in 2014 and 2015 in soybean fields treated with a Group 2 herbicide. Common ragweed seeds were collected from 123 fields. Seedlings were grown and tested for resistance using the recommended rate of imazethapyr (100.8 g a.e. ha -1 ). Weed populations were classified as susceptible, developing resistance (less than one third of plants classified as resistant) or resistant (at least one third of plants were resistant). Twenty populations were then selected based on these resistance levels and treated with four doses of the herbicide (0, 100.8, 201.6, and 403.2 g a.e. ha -1 ). Resistance to imazethapyr was detected in 81% of samples (21.1% were classified as developing resistance and 59.4% were classified as resistant). Populations classified as developing resistance had a resistance factor of 1.04, while populations classified as resistant had a resistance factor greater than 5. These results confirm the presence of multiple populations of imazethapyr-resistant common ragweed in Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".