MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996318317 · doi:10.1155/2019/5693654

Experimental Evaluation of the Influences of Water on the Fracture Toughness of Mudstones with Bedding

2019· article· en· W2996318317 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Materials Science and Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMaterials scienceFracture toughnessCoringFracture (geology)Composite materialBrittlenessTransverse planeBeddingToughnessDegree (music)Structural engineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of water on fracture toughness in various modes of mudstones was investigated using semicircular bend (SCB) specimens exposed to three-point bendings. Natural mudstone specimens are obtained using a special coring method and are then classified into three types (A, B, and C) corresponding to three directions/configurations of bedding planes (divider, arrester, and transverse). The results show that the Type A (divider configuration) specimens possess the largest fracture toughness value for all tested modes and same soaking time, whereas the Type C (transverse configuration) specimens have the smallest one. By increasing soaking time, the fracture toughness in all three modes decreases and the fracture mechanism changes from brittle failure to ductile failure. Among them, the Type C specimens have the highest degree of degradation for each soaking time period. Regarding the fracture modes, the degradation degree of K Ic is higher than that of K IIc for all three types of mudstone specimens. In addition, K IIc / K Ic ratio increases when soaking time is extended. Furthermore, in the initial and short soaking time stages, the experimental K IIc / K Ic results are consistent with theoretical findings from modified MTS criterion. However, after being soaked 300 minutes for three types of specimens, the test curves deviate from the theoretical curves. Analogously, the mixed-mode I/II ratio of K eff to K Ic is consistent with the theoretical values in the initial stage when the degree of damage is low. With soaking time increasing, the experimental curve is gradually deviated from the theoretical curve. When soaking time reaches 300 minutes, the deviation is substantial. And the test data for the Type-A specimens are observed to provide better agreements with theoretical predictions by modified MTS criterion than those for the other two types of specimens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it