MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996409744

Statistics on Low-Lying Liquid and Liquid-Dominant Mixed-Phase Clouds over Ottawa

2006· article· en· W2996409744 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueESASP · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiosondeLiquid water pathEnvironmental scienceLiquid water contentCloud topMeteorologyRelative humidityHumidityRadiometerCloud baseWater vaporCloud computingCloud heightAtmospheric sciencesRemote sensingCloud coverGeographyGeologyPrecipitationComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Communications Research Centre Canada (CRC) in Ottawa employs a multifrequency profiling radiometer to model the impact of clouds and water vapour on Earth-Space links. The profiling radiometer can retrieve vertical profiles of temperature, humidity and cloud liquid water every 30 seconds or every minute from the surface up to 10 km in height under clear sky and cloudy conditions. It is also capable of assessing the columnar cloud liquid water content (also known as the liquid water path L) and the water vapour path continuously, unlike what can be achieved with conventional radiosondes. The profiler also features an infrared thermometer that detects the cloud base temperature: the cloud base height of the lowest layer can thus be estimated using the contemporaneous temperature profile. Statistics on liquid water path, cloud base height and cloud top height for non-precipitating liquid-phase and mixed-phase stratus and stratocumulus clouds observed over CRC between April 2005 and April 2006 during the daytime are presented in this paper. According to the land cloud climatology of Hahn and Warren [1], these clouds are one of the most frequently occurring liquid-bearing types over a 5-degree by 5-degree box that includes the Ottawa area. Cloud top height has been assessed using CRC's cloud detection algorithm [2]. It is based on the Chernykh and Eskridge (CE) method that was originally designed to detect cloud layers and amounts from radiosonde profiles [3]. Our algorithm uses the CE method with retrieved vertical profiles of temperature and relative humidity, but also data not measured by radiosondes: the cloud base height estimated by the infrared thermometer, and the retrieved L. This extra set of conditions can be summarized as follows: a cloud contains liquid water whenever L exceeds a certain threshold value computed for each profile [2] and its cloud base height is lower than some maximum value (found to be 6 km in [2]). This cloud detection algorithm has been shown to significantly reduce the number of false positives compared to the application of the original CE method [2]. Daytime seasonal and annual averages will be compared, whenever possible, to the 6-year climatology of midlatitude low-level continental clouds from the United States ARM Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility, Oklahoma, reported in [4]. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this 6-year cloud climatology is the only one available in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it