La contribution des Universités dans la mise en œuvre des ODD au Sénégal : le cas de l’Université Alioune Diop de Bambey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte est une contribution a la mise en œuvre des ODD au Senegal de maniere generale, dans la localite de Bambey en particulier. Inspires de l’approche integree des ODD de l’Institut Hydro-Quebec en Environnement Developpement et Societe de l’Universite Laval, deux ateliers sont realises en juillet 2017 a l’Universite Alioune Diop de Bambey (UADB), d’abord avec les occupants de l’Universite (etudiants, personnels d’administration technique et de services et enseignants) ensuite avec les acteurs de societe civile de Bambey. Ces deux ateliers d’appropriation et de mise en situation des 17 ODD ont abouti a des resultats dont l’analyse sociale, economique et environnementale a mis en exergue, pour chaque cadre d’analyse des problematiques agregees a des ODD. Des liens directs et indirects sont etablis entre l’ODD cible et les autres en apportant des justifications a toutes les liaisons positives ou negatives. Le systeme de priorisation privilegie est axe sur un large consensus sur les ODD pour lesquels, l’UADB et la communaute de Bambey doivent se mobiliser pour eriger l’Universite en campus durable et impulser le developpement local. Pour propulser la dynamique communautaire et universitaire vers de meilleures conditions de vies des habitants, les participants aux ateliers ont elabore des solutions aux problemes sociaux, environnementaux et economiques souleves. Ces solutions sont formulees sous forme de projets pouvant faire office de laboratoires vivants dans lesquels, des chercheurs, des elus locaux, des organismes communautaires et d’autres acteurs pourront interagir et panser les maux de la commune de Bambey, de l’UADB en renforcant la dynamique de la gouvernance participative, un des prerequis de la mise en œuvre des ODD dans des endroits comme le Senegal. Mots-cles : ODD, Bambey, developpement local, gouvernance participative, organisation communautaire This text is a contribution to the implementation of the SDGs in Senegal in general, in the locality of Bambey in particular. Inspired by the integrated approach of the SDGs of the Hydro-Quebec Institute for Environment Development and Society of Laval University, two workshops are conducted in July 2017 at the University Alioune Diop Bambey (UADB), first with the University occupants (students, technical administration and service staff, and teachers) and then with Bambey civil society actors. These two workshops for the appropriation and implementation of the 17 SDGs resulted in results whose social, economic and environmental analysis highlighted, for each framework of analysis of the issues aggregated to the SDGs. Direct and indirect links are established between the targeted SDG and others by providing rationale for all positive and negative linkages. The preferred prioritization system is based on a broad consensus on the SDGs for which the UADB and the Bambey community must mobilize to build the University into a sustainable campus and boost local development. To propel the community and university dynamics towards better living conditions of the inhabitants, the participants of the workshops elaborated solutions to the social, environmental and economic problems raised. These solutions are formulated in the form of projects that can act as living laboratories in which researchers, local elected representatives, community organizations and other actors can interact and heal the ills of the Bambey commune of the UADB by reinforcing the dynamics of participatory governance, one of the prerequisites for implementing the SDGs in places like Senegal. Key words : SDGs, Bambey, local development, participatory governance, community organisation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".