Structural Studies of Overlapping Dinucleosomes in Solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An overlapping dinucleosome (OLDN) is a structure composed of one hexasome and one octasome and appears to be formed through nucleosome collision promoted by nucleosome remodeling factor(s). In this study, the solution structure of the OLDN was investigated through the integration of small-angle x-ray and neutron scattering (SAXS and SANS, respectively), computer modeling, and molecular dynamics simulations. Starting from the crystal structure, we generated a conformational ensemble based on normal mode analysis and searched for the conformations that reproduced the SAXS and SANS scattering curves well. We found that inclusion of histone tails, which are not observed in the crystal structure, greatly improved model quality. The obtained structural models suggest that OLDNs adopt a variety of conformations stabilized by histone tails situated at the interface between the hexasome and octasome, simultaneously binding to both the hexasomal and octasomal DNA. In addition, our models define a possible direction for the conformational changes or dynamics, which may provide important information that furthers our understanding of the role of chromatin dynamics in gene regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".