MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996716669 · doi:10.1111/cea.13553

Longitudinal trajectories of severe wheeze exacerbations from infancy to school age and their association with early‐life risk factors and late asthma outcomes

2019· article· en· W2996716669 on OpenAlex
Matea Deliu, Sara Fontanella, Sadia Haider, Matthew Sperrin, Nophar Geifman, Clare Murray, Angela Simpson, Adnan Čustović

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical & Experimental Allergy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsWheezeAsthmaMedicineLongitudinal studyAssociation (psychology)PediatricsDemographyImmunologyPsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Exacerbation‐prone asthma subtype has been reported in studies using data‐driven methodologies. However, patterns of severe exacerbations have not been studied. Objective To investigate longitudinal trajectories of severe wheeze exacerbations from infancy to school age. Methods We applied longitudinal k‐means clustering to derive exacerbation trajectories among 887 participants from a population‐based birth cohort with severe wheeze exacerbations confirmed in healthcare records. We examined early‐life risk factors of the derived trajectories, and their asthma‐related outcomes and lung function in adolescence. Results 498/887 children (56%) had physician‐confirmed wheeze by age 8 years, of whom 160 had at least one severe exacerbation. A two‐cluster model provided the optimal solution for severe exacerbation trajectories among these 160 children: “Infrequent exacerbations (IE)” (n = 150, 93.7%) and “Early‐onset frequent exacerbations (FE)” (n = 10, 6.3%). Shorter duration of breastfeeding was the strongest early‐life risk factor for FE (weeks, median [IQR]: FE, 0 [0‐1.75] vs. IE, 6 [0‐20], P < .001). Specific airway resistance (sR aw ) was significantly higher in FE compared with IE trajectory throughout childhood. We then compared children in the two exacerbation trajectories with those who have never wheezed (NW, n = 389) or have wheezed but had no severe exacerbations (WNE, n = 338). At age 8 years, FEV 1 /FVC was significantly lower and FeNO significantly higher among FE children compared with all other groups. By adolescence (age 16), subjects in FE trajectory were significantly more likely to have current asthma (67% FE vs. 30% IE vs. 13% WNE, P < .001) and use inhaled corticosteroids (77% FE vs. 15% IE vs. 18% WNE, P < .001). Lung function was significantly diminished in the FE trajectory (FEV 1 /FVC, mean [95%CI]: 89.9% [89.3‐90.5] vs. 88.1% [87.3‐88.8] vs. 85.1% [83.4‐86.7] vs. 74.7% [61.5‐87.8], NW, WNE, IE, FE respectively, P < .001). Conclusion We have identified two distinct trajectories of severe exacerbations during childhood with different early‐life risk factors and asthma‐related outcomes in adolescence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it