MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hubungan Pemberian Asi Eksklusif Dan Status Gizi Ibu Dengan Pertumbuhan Lingkar Kepala Bayi Usia 6 Bulan

2019· article· en· W2996759729 on OpenAlexaff
Ivanda Glanny Anindya, Harsono Salimo, Yulia Lanti Retno Dewi

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerta Nutrition · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHead circumferenceBreastfeedingAnthropometryObstetricsPediatricsPregnancyBirth weightInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Measurement of head circumference is highly crucial during the early years of life which considered as an anthropometric parameter substantially correlated with brain size. The emergence of head circumference aberration functions to warn of abnormal brain development. Breast milk is the ideal nutritional provider that babies need for optimal healthy growth. Nursing mothers with good nutrition will affect their nutritional status. The nutritional status will determine the quantity and quality of dairy products that indirectly play a role in determining children’s nutritional status.Objective: Analyzing the relationship between exclusive breastfeeding and maternal nutritional status with the growth of the head circumference of 6 months old infants.Method: Using a cross-sectional design in the Kaliwates, Jember. Subjects were 6 months old infants in which 128 babies were selected by purposive sampling. Data on maternal nutritional status were based on Body Mass Index (BMI). Data on exclusive breastfeeding were based on interviews and KMS data. The baby’s head circumference data were based on direct measurements and those were interpreted using WHO growth charts. Then, the data were analyzed using Chi-Square test.Results: The results showed that there was a significant relationship between exclusive breastfeeding (p<0.001) and maternal nutritional status (p=0.028) with the growth of the baby’s head circumference.Conclusion: Exclusive breastfeeding and maternal nutritional status are associated with the growth of the baby’s head circumference. ABSTRAKLatar Belakang : Pengukuran lingkar kepala sangat penting selama tahun awal kehidupan, hal ini merupakan parameter antropometri yang sangat berkorelasi dengan ukuran otak. Terjadi penyimpangan pada lingkar kepala, maka memperingatkan perkembangan otak yang tidak normal. Air susu ibu merupakan penyedia nutrisi ideal yang dibutuhkan bayi untuk pertumbuhan yang sehat secara optimal. Ibu menyusui dengan pemenuhan gizi yang baik akan mempengaruhi status gizinya. Status gizi tersebut akan menentukan kuantitas dan kualitas produk susu yang secara tidak langsung berperan dalam menentukan status gizi anak.Tujuan : Menganalisis hubungan pemberian ASI eksklusif dan status gizi ibu dengan pertumbuhan lingkar kepala bayi usia 6 bulan.Metode : Menggunakan desain cross-sectional di wilayah Kecamatan Kaliwates, Kabupaten Jember. Subjek penelitian adalah bayi usia 6 bulan, 128 bayi dipilih dengan purposive sampling. Data status gizi ibu berdasarkan IMT. Data pemberian ASI eksklusif berdasarkan wawancara dan data KMS. Data lingkar kepala bayi berdasarkan pengukuran langsung dan diinterprestasikan menggunakan grafik pertumbuhan WHO. Analisis data menggunakan uji Chi-Square.Hasil : Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada hubungan yang bermakna antara pemberian ASI eksklusif (ρ = <0,001 dan OR 9,58) dan status gizi ibu (ρ = 0,028 dan OR 0,28) dengan pertumbuhan lingkar kepala bayi usia 6 bulan.Kesimpulan : Pemberian ASI eksklusif pada bayi akan memberikan pertumbuhan lingkar kepala yang normal dibandingkan bayi yang tidak diberikan ASI eksklusif dan pada ibu yang memiliki status gizi baik juga akan memberikan pertumbuhan lingkar kepala bayi yang normal dibandingkan dengan ibu berstatus gizi kurang dan gemuk. Kata kunci : status gizi, ASI eksklusif, lingkar kepala

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerta NutritionSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207