Beamforming Learning for mmWave Communication: Theory and Experimental Validation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To establish reliable and long-range millimeter-wave (mmWave) communication, beamforming is deemed to be a promising solution. Although beamforming can be done in the digital and analog domains, both approaches are hindered by several constraints when it comes to mmWave communications. For example, performing fully digital beamforming in mmWave systems involves using many radio frequency (RF) chains, which are expensive and consume high power. This necessitates finding more efficient ways for using fewer RF chains while taking advantage of the large antenna arrays. One way to overcome this challenge is to employ (partially or fully) analog beamforming through proper configuration of phase-shifters. Existing works on mmWave analog beam design either rely on the knowledge of the channel state information (CSI) per antenna within the array, require a large search time (e.g., exhaustive search) or do not guarantee a minimum beamforming gain (e.g., codebook based beamforming). In this paper, we propose a beam design technique that reduces the search time and does not require CSI while guaranteeing a minimum beamforming gain. The key idea derives from observations drawn from real-life measurements. It was observed that for a given propagation environment (e.g., coverage area of a mmWave BS) the azimuthal angles of dominant signals could be more probable from certain angles than others. Thus, pre-collected measurements could used to build a beamforming codebook that regroups the most probable beam designs. We invoke Bayesian learning for measurements clustering. We evaluate the efficacy of the proposed scheme in terms of building the codebook and assessing its performance through real-life measurements. We demonstrate that the training time required by the proposed scheme is only 5% of that of exhaustive search. This crucial gain is obtained while achieving a minimum targeted beamforming gain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".