MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996794444 · doi:10.2118/0120-0045-jpt

Heavy Oil Innovation Haunted by Low Oil Prices and Bad Memories

2019· article· en· W2996794444 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen Rassenfoss

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeating oilElectricityWork (physics)EngineeringOperations managementBusinessFinanceElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oil production from heavy oil wells in western Canada jumped after One of those wells is owned by Canadian Natural Resources (CNRL), which reported that production rose 50% (SPE 196187). The gains “have proven the economics of continuing the operation of the downhole electric heat and CNRL will be applying to continue the enhanced oil recovery process,” according to a report to the Alberta Energy Regulator. Still, those heating cables made by Salamander Solutions are a tough sell. It is up against depressed heavy oil prices, the high cost of electricity in some locations, and long memories of heating cables that failed. “I talked to an operator who told me the reservoir performance when the heater lasted was great, but he would never do it again,” said John Karanikas, the chief technology officer for Salamander, who said that none of its cables has gone out in a customer’s well. Older cables required multiple splices to connect 100–200 m sections. If one of those weak points failed, the rest of the line went out like a string of lights after a single bulb fails, said Scott Penny, general manager for Petrospec Engineering, a partner in the business that installs the heating cables. Salamander’s cables can heat a well more than 7,000 ft long without a splice, Karanikas said. The company is working on planning some complicated installations where a splice is required. The company has put a lot of work into more durable ways of connecting cables, which it has patented. Heating cable technology was developed by Shell, which needed electric cables capable of heating rock to 650°F—which required an electric cable that could heat to 1200°F. In comparison, heavy oil is easy. It only needs to reach 300°F. (Oil shale is kerogen-rich rock where extreme heat can extract a lot of oil, which is different that oil in shale, which is in ultratight rock that is released using fracturing.) Shell tested the cables by running them at even higher temperatures, jolting them with extreme power surges, and simulating years of hard use, Karanikas said. The cable passed those tests and worked in the field, but Shell dropped oil shale in favor of more conventional oil and gas options. Salamander was created to market the heating cable technology, with a staff made up of many veterans of the development process. Tough Customers Both tests in the recent paper were in older wells in a heavy oil field. The many wells like those, which are still on primary production, could offer a large market for electric heating. The Salamander heater cable in the CNRL well was installed by Shell, which sold the field to the Canadian company. Shell was looking for a heating alternative to steam that did not require costly casing upgrades to handle steam heat, said Carl Stretch, a Shell engineer who worked on the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207