MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2996794910 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10501506.1

Environmental modulations of nutrient conditions in the Labrador Sea reconstructed from nitrogen isotopes in a six-hundred-year-old crustose coralline alga

2019· preprint· en· W2996794910 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John M. Doherty, B. Williams, Esme Kline, Walter H. Adey, Benoît Thibodeau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation of Sri LankaUniversity Research Committee, University of Hong Kong
KeywordsOceanographyCrustoseNutrientNitrateEnvironmental scienceNorth Atlantic oscillationAdvectionAtlantic multidecadal oscillationOcean currentEcologyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The climatological impacts on biogeochemical processes in the polar North Atlantic remain poorly understood, as there exist both biological and physical mechanisms that drive nutrient availability in the region. Here, we present nitrogen isotope measurements (δN) from a six-hundred-year-old coralline alga to elucidate historic and modern trends in Labrador Sea nitrate utilization, defined as the degree of biological nitrate assimilation relative to nitrate supply. Prior to the Little Ice Age (LIA), periods during which utilization became complete corresponded to neutral modes of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), which we argue promoted the oceanographic conditions favorable for simultaneous phytoplankton growth and reduced nitrate input. More recently, nitrate utilization became complete during periods characterized by reduced deep-water convection in the Labrador Sea, suggesting a reduced inflow of equatorially-sourced nitrate driven by a weakening of the Labrador Current. Such nutrient rerouting may have implications for socioeconomically-important fisheries and carbon sequestration throughout the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→