MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Column-free isolation of untouched CD4+CD127lowCD49d- human regulatory T cells in 45 minutes (168.4)

2011· article· en· W299689310 on OpenAlexaff
Andy I. Kokaji, Garry MacDonald, Terry E. Thomas, Maureen Fairhurst

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsStemcell Technologies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFOXP3Interleukin-7 receptorEffectorBiologyCell biologyImmune systemPopulationIsolation (microbiology)ImmunologyIntracellularT cellComputational biologyIL-2 receptorBioinformaticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a subset of lymphocytes that play a key role in maintaining immune homeostasis. The isolation of highly purified Tregs is essential for advancing this exciting field of research. FOXP3 remains the best marker for the identification of Tregs, but its intracellular localization currently precludes its use for the isolation of viable human Tregs. To overcome these technical difficulties, researchers have exploited the expression of other surface markers to isolate Treg populations. Typically, the expression of CD127 inversely correlates with FOXP3 expression, while CD49d, is expressed on the majority of pro-inflammatory effector cells but is absent on Tregs. Removal of CD127high cells from the CD4+ T-cell population enriches for Tregs with high levels of FOXP3 expression. Additional depletion of CD49d expressing cells further removes contaminating IFNγ and IL-17 secreting cells. Together this strategy permits selective isolation of highly enriched Tregs. We have developed a new kit for the negative enrichment of highly purified human Tregs. Our new EasySep™ CD4+CD127lowCD49d- kit isolates untouched Tregs by by column-free magnetic separation in only 45 minutes. Mean CD4+ T-cell purity is 94.3% +/- 5.5% of which 65.5% +/- 11.7% express high levels of FOXP3 (n=7). This new product will add to the array of powerful yet convenient tools available for the isolation of functional highly purified human Tregs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicImmune Cell Function and Interaction→French-language works237,207→