MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996902095 · doi:10.1093/brain/awz379

MN1 C-terminal truncation syndrome is a novel neurodevelopmental and craniofacial disorder with partial rhombencephalosynapsis

2019· article· en· W2996902095 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Chun Yu Mak, Dan Doherty, Angela E. Lin, Nancy Végas, Megan T. Cho, Géraldine Viot, Clémantine Dimartino, James D. Weisfeld‐Adams, Davor Lessel, Shelagh Joss, Chumei Li, Claudia Gonzaga‐Jauregui, Yuri A. Zárate, Nadja Ehmke, Denise Horn, Caitlin Troyer, Sarina G. Kant, Youngha Lee, Gisele E. Ishak, Gordon Leung, Amanda Barone Pritchard, Sandra Yang, Eric G. Bend, Francesca Filippini, Chelsea Roadhouse, Nicolas Lebrun, Michele G. Mehaffey, Pierre‐Marie Martin, Benjamin J. Apple, Francisca Millan, Oliver Puk, Mariëtte J.V. Hoffer, Lindsay B. Henderson, Ruth McGowan, Ingrid M. Wentzensen, Steven Lim Cho Pei, Farah Zahir, Mullin H.C. Yu, William T. Gibson, Marcie Steeves, Jill R. Murrell, Sabine Luettgen, E. Nicolás Francisco, Tim M. Strom, Louise Amlie‐Wolf, Angela M. Kaindl, William G. Wilson, Sara Halbach, Lina Basel‐Vanagaite, Noa Lev-El, Jonas Denecke, Lisenka E.L.M. Vissers, Kelly Radtke, Jamel Chelly, Elaine H. Zackai, Jan M. Friedman, Michael J. Bamshad, Deborah A. Nickerson, Russell R. Reid, Koenraad Devriendt, Jong‐Hee Chae, Elliot Stolerman, Carey McDougall, Zöe Powis, Thierry Bienvenu, Tiong Yang Tan, Naama Orenstein, William B. Dobyns, Joseph T.C. Shieh, Murim Choi, Darrel Waggoner, Karen W. Gripp, Michael Parker, Joan M. Stoler, Stanislas Lyonnet, Valérie Cormier‐Daire, David Viskochil, Trevor L. Hoffman, Jeanne Amiel, Brian Hon‐Yin Chung, Christopher T. Gordon

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcMaster University Medical Centre
FundersMSDAVENIRNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of HealthEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentAgence Nationale de la RechercheWellcome Trust
KeywordsHaploinsufficiencyPolymicrogyriaCraniofacialMacrocephalyGeneticsCraniofacial abnormalityBiologyIntellectual disabilityNeurodevelopmental disorderExonMedicineNeuroscienceEpilepsyPhenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MN1 encodes a transcriptional co-regulator without homology to other proteins, previously implicated in acute myeloid leukaemia and development of the palate. Large deletions encompassing MN1 have been reported in individuals with variable neurodevelopmental anomalies and non-specific facial features. We identified a cluster of de novo truncating mutations in MN1 in a cohort of 23 individuals with strikingly similar dysmorphic facial features, especially midface hypoplasia, and intellectual disability with severe expressive language delay. Imaging revealed an atypical form of rhombencephalosynapsis, a distinctive brain malformation characterized by partial or complete loss of the cerebellar vermis with fusion of the cerebellar hemispheres, in 8/10 individuals. Rhombencephalosynapsis has no previously known definitive genetic or environmental causes. Other frequent features included perisylvian polymicrogyria, abnormal posterior clinoid processes and persistent trigeminal artery. MN1 is encoded by only two exons. All mutations, including the recurrent variant p.Arg1295* observed in 8/21 probands, fall in the terminal exon or the extreme 3' region of exon 1, and are therefore predicted to result in escape from nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. This was confirmed in fibroblasts from three individuals. We propose that the condition described here, MN1 C-terminal truncation (MCTT) syndrome, is not due to MN1 haploinsufficiency but rather is the result of dominantly acting C-terminally truncated MN1 protein. Our data show that MN1 plays a critical role in human craniofacial and brain development, and opens the door to understanding the biological mechanisms underlying rhombencephalosynapsis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207