MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996950858 · doi:10.1002/ccd.28670

Long‐term outcomes of percutaneous closure of coronary artery fistulae in the adult: A single‐center experience

2019· article· en· W2996950858 on OpenAlexaff
Ashish H. Shah, Mark Osten, Lee Benson, Sami Alnasser, Yvonne Bach, Lukas Meier, Eric Horlick

Bibliographic record

VenueCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Artery Anomalies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto General HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenSt. Boniface HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneousChest painSurgeryMyocardial infarctionCardiac catheterizationPercutaneous coronary interventionCardiologyInternal medicineAcute coronary syndromePalpitations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronary artery fistulae (CAF) are rare congenital cardiac abnormalities. With increasing age, patients with moderate to large fistulae are likely to become symptomatic and encounter complications. Percutaneous closure has been accepted as a safe and effective alternative to surgery; however, information regarding long-term outcomes in adult patients after transcatheter closure is limited. METHODS: We describe our 20-year experience with percutaneous closure of CAF in adult patients, focusing on long-term outcomes. RESULTS: From 1995 to 2015, 25 adult patients underwent 33 transcatheter interventions to close 26 CAF at our institution. Mean age was 51.4 ± 16.8 years, and 14 (56%) were female. All the patients were symptomatic with dyspnea (21/25, 84%) being the most common complaint followed by chest pain (17/25, 68%), palpitations (9/25, 36%), and heart failure (2/25, 8%). Two patients presented with acute coronary syndrome, whereas 10/25 (40%) also had inducible ischemia on stress test. These CAFs were classified as medium (12, 46.2%), large (5, 19.2%), and giant (9, 34.6%). Immediately postprocedure complete occlusion was achieved in 21 (21/26, 81%), and residual trace leak was observed in three fistulae, whereas we could not deliver coils/device in two cases. Periprocedural complications occurred in the form of coronary dissection (n = 1), myocardial infarction (n = 2), coil embolization (n = 1), transient ST elevation (n = 1); the majority of complications were observed in the early years of our experience. Patients reported marked improvement in symptoms after the intervention. During a mean follow-up of 76 ± 69 (5-214 months) (n = 22), 15 patients were investigated by either conventional (n = 6) or CT angiography (n = 8) or both (n = 1) that demonstrated thrombotic occlusion of a proximal coronary artery where a distal fistula was treated. Another patient was noted to have thrombus proximal to a vascular plug in a distal giant fistula. Three patients were lost to follow-up. None of the investigated patients had recanalization of their fistula. We did not observe remodeling of the native coronary artery that was feeding the fistula, even after successful complete closure. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous device closure of CAF is a feasible and effective therapeutic intervention in adult patients; however, patients with distal fistulas represent a significant challenge and the outcomes of these procedures are in question. All patients should have long-term angiographic follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCatheterization and Cardiovascular InterventionsSame topicCoronary Artery AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207