MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996992645 · doi:10.1093/jas/skz258.794

PSIX-12 Screening of peptides for their impact of protease, protease dose and peptide dose on in vitro rumen dry matter digestibility

2019· article· en· W2996992645 on OpenAlexaff
Wenzhu Yang, Yizhao Shen, Ranithri Abeynayakea, Lingyun Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaLethbridge CollegeAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProteaseRumenDry matterProteasesSilageChemistryPeptideAnimal scienceCompletely randomized designFood scienceBiologyBiochemistryEnzymeFermentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objective of this study was to screening peptides for the effects on in vitro rumen dry matter (DM) digestibility (DMD) of feeds in batch culture. Three brewers spent grain (BSG) samples from different batches were obtained from a local brewery. Peptides were developed with BSG protein varying protease (alcalase, everlase, flavourzyme) and protease dosages (protease:BSG protein; 1:100, 5:100, 10:100, 15:100) under optimum pH and temperature conditions. In total, 36 peptides were produced and screened. A series of batch cultures were conducted and substrates were barley silage and barley grain. The experiment was a complete randomized design with a factorial arrangement; 3 proteases × 4 protease doses + 4 doses of each peptide (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5% of substrate DM) with 3 replications of each treatment combination. Rumen inoculum was from three rumen fistulated beef heifers fed a diet consisting of 10% silage and 90% concentrate (DM basis). The incubation was conducted at 39°C for 24 h. Interactions among protease, protease dose and peptide dose were not significant. For barley grain, DMD differed (P < 0.01) among proteases (85.2, 72.3, 65.2%, respectively, for alcalase, flavourzise, everlase). Increasing peptide doses from 0, 0.5, 1.0 to 1.5% linearly (P < 0.01) decreased the DMD from 88 to 78% (alcalase), 69 to 59% (everlase) and 78 to 67% (flavourzyme); whereas protease dose did not affect the DMD. With barley silage, the DMD was higher (P < 0.05) with flavourzyme (65.3%) than alcalase (59.2%) or everlase (61.2%); in contrast, the DMD was affected neither by protease dose nor by the peptide dose, except that increasing supplementation of peptide derived from everlase linearly (P < 0.05) decreased the DMD (65.1 to 58.9%). These results indicated that the peptides derived from BSG decreased in vitro rumen feed digestibility, which varied with proteases, peptide dose or feeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesFrench-language works237,207