MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2997047384

Decadal Changes in Seasonal Variation of Atmospheric Haze over the Eastern United States: Connections with Anthropogenic Emissions and Implications for Aerosol Composition

2018· article· en· W2997047384 on OpenAlexaff
C. Li, Randall V. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueAGUFM · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeasonalityEnvironmental scienceHazeAerosolAtmospheric sciencesClimatologyVisibilityParticulatesAir quality indexSpatial distributionGeographyMeteorologyChemistryGeologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current seasonal summer maximum in surface fine particulate matter (PM2.5) over the eastern United States has been well established. We find that this seasonality has historically changed substantially, based on long-term quality assured inverse visibility (1/Vis) data over 1946–1998. The median summer/winter 1/Vis ratio increased from about 0.8 over both the southeastern and northeastern United States in the late 1940s to 1.24 over the southeastern United States and to 1.04 over the northeastern United States in the mid-1970s. This ratio exhibits weaker changes in both regions afterward. The observed PM2.5 seasonality after the year 2000 has similar spatial distribution as that in 1/Vis over the mid-1990s, with systematically higher summer/winter ratios which rapidly weaken after the mid-2000s. From 1956 to 1975, stronger increases in 1/Vis occurred in summer than in winter in both regions, associated with increases in sulfur dioxide emissions and reductions in anthropogenic carbonaceous emissions. O...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAGUFM→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→