MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997205960 · doi:10.1039/c9fo01598a

Molecular imprinted polymers for the controlled uptake of sinapic acid from aqueous media

2019· article· en· W2997205960 on OpenAlexafffund
Roya Fathi Til, Mohammad Alizadeh‐Khaledabad, Réza Mohammadi, Sajad Pirsa, Lee D. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueFood & Function · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsSaskatoon Medical ImagingUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsEthylene glycol dimethacrylateMolecularly imprinted polymerMonomerPrecipitation polymerizationAdsorptionAqueous solutionPolymerPolymerizationChemistrySelective adsorptionMethacrylic acidPolymer chemistryThermogravimetryNuclear chemistryChemical engineeringSelectivityOrganic chemistryRadical polymerizationInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several unique molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) were synthesized via a precipitation polymerization technique using 4-vinylpyridine as a functional monomer and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as a cross-linker for selective separation of sinapic acid from aqueous solution. Three sets of MIPs with different functional monomer : cross-linker molar ratios at 4 : 20; 8 : 20 and 8 : 32 were prepared along with the corresponding non-templated polymers (NIPs). The MIPs and NIPs were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, N2 adsorption analysis, thermogravimetry, and FT-IR/solids 13C NMR spectroscopy. Batch rebinding and selectivity experiments were carried out to evaluate their adsorption performance, where the MIP prepared with a 4 : 20 monomer : cross-linker mole ratio had significantly higher affinity toward sinapic acid. Notably, all MIPs displayed greater molecular recognition with sinapic acid relative to the NIPs. Therefore, MIPs prepared by this approach represent promising advanced materials for the pre-concentration, isolation and enrichment of sinapic acid from complex food matrices or controlled removal from agricultural waste streams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood & FunctionSame topicAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFrench-language works237,207