MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Indoor Occupancy Prediction using an IoT Platform

2019· article· en· W2997283575 on OpenAlexaff
Alec Parise, Miguel Ángel Manso Callejo, Hung Cao, Marco Mendonça, Harpreet S Kohli, Mónica Wachowicz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOccupancySoftware portabilityComputer scienceCloud computingBuilding automationWireless sensor networkScalabilityReal-time computingHome automationInternet of ThingsEmbedded systemDatabaseComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineeringOperating systemArchitectural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current research in indoor sensor networks has pointed out an emerging interest in occupancy detection for Building Information Management (BIM) because buildings use 68% of Canadas energy in operation and contribute 17% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This research paper aims at developing a non-intrusive sensing method for predicting occupancy towards reducing building emission while also promoting a comfortable and productive working environment, while retaining the privacy of occupants. Towards this end, an IoT platform consisting of three main components: the edge computing environment, cloud based infrastructure, and network communication, together create a robust open source IoT architecture. The open source IoT architecture employs temperature, humidity, and pressure sensors for observing ambient environmental characteristics while combining PIR motion sensors, CO2, and sound detectors. An occupancy detection model is then developed by applying Support Vector Machine (SVM) to predict occupancy patterns from the incoming IoT sensor data. This platform is a low-cost and highly scalable both in terms of the variety of on board sensors and portability of the sensor nodes, which makes it well suited for multiple applications related to occupancy and environmental monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207