Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kebijakan Dividen Sebagai Variabel Moderating
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Company value is generally applied to measurea company’s management for further successful operations. This study aimed to investigate the effect of liquidity (CR), leverage (DER), activity (TATO), profitability (ROA) and dividend policy (DPR) on the company value (PBV). Therefore, this study observed 66 manufacturing companies as samples that were obtained through purposive sampling. The data was analyzed using classic assumption test Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) assisted with SPSS 20 for windows. As the result, this study indicated that the liquidity and activity had no significant effect on firm value; however, the leverage and profitability had a significant effect on the manufacturing company values in the period of 2013 to 2017. In addition, thedividend policy moderated the effect of liquidity and profitability on firm value; but the dividend policy could not moderate the influence of leverage and activity to the value of manufacturing companies in the period of 2013 to 2017. ABSTRAK Nilai perusahaan dijadikan sebagai suatu ukuran keberhasilan manajemen perusahaan dalam prospek operasi di masa mendatang. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui signifikansi pengaruh Likuiditas (CR), Leverage (DER), Aktivitas (TATO), Profitabilitas (ROA) dan Kebijakan Dividen (DPR) terhadap Nilai Perusahaan (PBV). Teknik penentuan sampel yang digunakan adalah purposive sampling, sebanyak 66 perusahaan Manufaktur yang menjadi sampel penelitian. Teknik analisa data yang digunakan adalah uji asumsi klasik dan Moderated Regression Analisys (MRA) dengan bantuan SPSS 20 for windows. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Likuiditas dan Aktivitas berpengaruh tidak signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan, sedangkan Leverage dan Profitabilitas berpengaruh signifikan terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Manufaktur periode 2013- 2017. Kebijakan Dividen memoderasi pengaruh Likuiditas dan profitabilitas terhadap nilai perusahaan, sedangkan KebijakanDividen tidak mampu memoderasi pengaruh Leverage dan Aktivitas terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Manufaktur periode 2013-2017. JEL Classification: M41, O16
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".