MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997409560 · doi:10.35473/jgk.v7i16.3

HUBUNGAN ANTARA SENAM HAMIL DENGAN PROSES PERSALINAN PADA IBU BERSALIN DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS SUMOWONO KABUPATEN SEMARANG

2015· article· id· W2997409560 on OpenAlexaff
Dwi Okta Diarini, Yuliaji Siswanto, Heni Hirawati Pranoto

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL GIZI DAN KESEHATAN · 2015
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Senam hamil adalah terapi latihan gerak untuk mempersiapkan ibu hamil secara fisikatau mental, agar persalinannya dapat berjalan secara spontan. Proses persalinan merupakanproses pengeluaran janin dari dalam rahim ke luar rahim melalui jalan lahir. Penelitian inibertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara senam hamil dengan proses persalinan pada ibubersalin.Jenis penelitian ini deskriptif korelatif. Desain yang digunakan cross sectional. Teknikpengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling Populasi penelitian seluruh ibubersalin yang mengikuti senam hamil periode Januari- Desember 2014 di wilayah KerjaPuskesmas Sumowono Kabupaten Semarang. Besar sampel 132 responden. Analisis datamenggunakan uji Chi Square.Hasil penelitian yang mengikuti senam hamil teratur dan proses persalinannya spontan88,2%. Sedangkan yang mengikuti senam hamil teratur dan proses persalinannya tidakspontan 56,4%. (0,05). Melalui uji Chi Square didapatkan nilai p-value 0,000<α (0,05)sehingga dapat disimpulkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara senam hamil terhadapproses persalinan pada ibu bersalin di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Sumowono KabupatenSemarang.Hal ini menunjukkan dengan melakukan senam hamil secara teratur dapat membantuproses persalinan. Untuk itu setiap ibu hamil diharapkan dapat mengikuti kelas senam hamildi lingkungan tempat tinggalnya.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL GIZI DAN KESEHATANSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207