MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997443270 · doi:10.33674/2201912

Book Review “Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War” University Press of Florida. Sean Burges"

2019· article· en· W2997443270 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Isabela de Andrade Gama

Bibliographic record

VenueAnte portas - studia nad bezpieczeństwem · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBrazilian History and Foreign Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCold warPolitical scienceHistoryForeign policyEconomic historyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, the author Sean Burges analyzes the main achievements of Brazilian foreign policy between 1992 and 2002.The choice of such a decade to be analyzed, according to the author, refers to the ten years (hitherto) of greatest achievements in Brazil.This decade in question is also called "The Decade of Fernando Henrique Cardoso".He was a foreign minister from 1992-1993, finance minister from 1993 -1994 , and president of Brazil from 1995 -2002.The Canadian scholar tries to understand "how" and "why" Brazil carving its space into the international scenario as a consensual hegemony.Burges does that examining official documents and from several interviews with Brazilian diplomats.And this method can be understood as his first mistake, since diplomats and official documents only disclosure what the Brazilian government wants to show.Meaning: not necessarily the "reality".After the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union Burges, the international scenario was going through a complicated phase of fast pace changings and growing in internationalization. Facing new challenges Burges claims the Brazilian government embarked on a Foreign Policy in a "quiet style of leadership on South America".Still, Brazilian diplomacy was seeking to keep the country's autonomy in the international sphere without foreign interference.According to this author, during Fernando Henrique Cardoso's "decade" Brazilian foreign policy was seeking this so-called "quiet leadership" in South America because being explicit would incur costs.Here is one more problem in his analysis, Brazil is very important to regional stability.However, during the two mandates of Cardoso, the main goal of the country's foreign policy wasn't to have leadership in the region.It's important, but it was clear that at that moment Brazilian foreign policy was directed towards carving a niche among the great powers, not among other countries of the Global South.At the beginning of the 1990s, Brazil was suffering from a huge economic crisis.Said that the country couldn't afford any kind of leadership in the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnte portas - studia nad bezpieczeństwemSame topicBrazilian History and Foreign PolicyFrench-language works237,207