MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997664436

The C-REX sounding rocket mission

2015· article· en· W2997664436 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. Conde, M. F. Larsen, D. Hampton, Manbharat Dhadly, J. Ahrns, A. L. Aruliah, Yoshihiro Kakinami, Barrett Barker, Andrew Kiene, F. Sigernes, D. A. Lorentzen

Bibliographic record

VenueNSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of SaskatchewanNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAeronauticsRocket (weapon)Sounding rocketRemote sensingDepth soundingGeologyComputer scienceEngineeringAerospace engineeringOceanography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For reasons that are not well understood, there are permanent enhancements in the neutral mass density in Earth's thermosphere in the vicinity of the northern and southern geomagnetic cusps, and at altitudes of around 400 km. Such enhancements are expected to cause small but important and currently unpredictable perturbations to the orbits of spacecraft flying through them. Here we report on a NASA sounding rocket mission to study mechanisms responsible for establishing and maintaining these enhancements. On November 24, 2014, a Black-Brant 12 sounding rocket was launched from Andoya Space Center out over the Greenland Sea, and into the enhancement region associated with the ionospheric footprint of the northern geomagnetic cusp. It released ten rocket-propelled "grenades" that dispersed barium strontium tracer clouds into the thermosphere throughout a 3D volume extending over many tens of km around the main trajectory, and spanning heights from 190 to 400 km. Subsequent motions of the ionized barium and neutral barium/strontium components of the clouds were determined by photographic triangulation, using cameras based at Longyearbyen, Ny-Alesund, and aboard a NASA aircraft flying just south of Svalbard. Initial results of this analysis will be presented, and the implications for the mechanism(s) responsible for the density anomaly will be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University)Same topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207