A Memoir of Friendship: The Letters between Carol Shields and Blanche Howard/Random Illuminations: Conversations with Carol Shields
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blanche Howard and Allison Howard (eds), A Memoir of Friendship: The Letters Between Carol Shields and Blanche Howard (Toronto: Penguin Canada, 2007), 352pp.Cased. $35. ISBN 978-0-6700-6613-1. Paper. $19. ISBN 978-0-1430-5226-5. Eleanor Wachtel, Random Illuminations: Conversations with Carol Shields (New Brunswick: Gooselane, 2007), 180pp. Paper. $19.95. ISBN 978-0-86492-501-5. These two rewarding volumes constitute a valuable supplement to Carol Shields's literary legacy. The first collates Shields's correspondence with her friend and fellow author Blanche Howard, with whom Shields collaborated on the epistolary novel A Celibate Season. The second volume brings together Shields's interviews with Eleanor Wachtel conducted between 1988 and 2002. Edited by Howard and her daughter Allison, A Memoir of Friendship begins with Anne Giardini's Foreword, which reflects upon the dying art of letter writing and contextualises Shields's and Howard's relationship. Shields first met Howard in the early 1970s in Ottawa and formed a friendship that would endure until Shields's death in 2003. Howard was, at the time of their first meeting, the more established writer, having won the 1972 Canadian Booksellers' Award for her novel The Manipulator. 'I have an overwhelming wish just to talk to someone about the whole subject of writing', Shields states in an early letter (p. 4), as she was embarking on her own literary career. Books would remain a focal point of the women's correspondence over the next thirty years. The volume is particularly fascinating for the intimate insight that it gives into the writing life, both private and public. Howard read drafts of almost all of Shields's novels and offered advice and suggestions that were usually incorporated by Shields into her work. Unfortunately, excessive editing of some of these comments makes this aspect of the volume rather less revealing than it might have been, though the development of A Celibate Season is covered fairly comprehensively. Both authors are disarmingly frank about their own writing. 'Some days I'm astonished by my brilliance and others I feel lower than Danielle Steele', Howard confesses (p. 499), while Shields wonders whether 'writers ever get to the point of complete faith in their blatherings' (p. 510). Howard's increasing struggles with publication are juxtaposed with Shields's growing success and fame, and reflections upon literary prizes and the stresses of promotion are also enlightening. Another highlight of the volume is the discussions of the books Shields and Howard are reading and their sometimes acerbic, pleasingly unorthodox comments on fiction, Canadian and otherwise. The Double Hook is dismissed as 'dreadful imitation Faulkner' (p. 10), The God of Small Things as 'high trash' (p. 377), The English Patient as 'awfully studied, terribly solemn, taking itself incredibly seriously' (p. 274), and The Blind Assassin as 'a long, dull read, alas' (p. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".