MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997707599 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.07296

A Substructural Epistemic Resource Logic: Theory and Modelling\n Applications

2019· article· W2997707599 on OpenAlexaff
Didier Galmiche, Pierre Kimmel, David Pym

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Canadian institutionsPrevention of Organ Failure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoundnessEpistemic modal logicCompleteness (order theory)ModalitiesComputer scienceSemantics (computer science)Resource (disambiguation)Theoretical computer scienceModal logicEpistemologyMultimodal logicCalculus (dental)Programming languageMathematicsDescription logicPhilosophySociologyMedicineModal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a substructural epistemic logic, based on Boolean BI, in which the\nepistemic modalities are parametrized on agents' local resources. The new\nmodalities can be seen as generalizations of the usual epistemic modalities.\nThe logic combines Boolean BI's resource semantics --- we introduce BI and its\nresource semantics at some length --- with epistemic agency. We illustrate the\nuse of the logic in systems modelling by discussing some examples about access\ncontrol, including semaphores, using resource tokens. We also give a labelled\ntableaux calculus and establish soundness and completeness with respect to the\nresource semantics.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeFrench-language works237,207