MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2997709104 · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v12n1p158

Application-Based Medical Eligibility Criteria Model of Contraception Use

2019· article· id· W2997709104 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Haspita Rizki Syurya Handini, Lita Angelina Saputri, Yuliva Yuliva

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Health Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonprobability samplingGynecologyPopulationMedicineFamily medicineNursingEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Masalah kesehatan reproduksi termasuk keluarga berencana merupakan salah satu permas alahan yang belum terselesaikan pada MDG's .Reproduction health problem including family planning is one of the unresolved issues in MDG's.Menurut SDKI 2012 penggunaan According to the Indonesia Health and Demography Survey in 2012, the usekontrasepsi of modern contraceptioncara modern hanya was only57,9% dan unmet need 8,5%. 57.9% and unmet need reached 8.5%.Salah satu penyebab tingginya unmet One of the causes of high unmetneed dan drop need and dropout adalah keterbatasan layanan kontrasepsi. out was the limitation of contraceptive services.Pemanfaatan Alat Bantu Pengambila n Keputusan (ABPK) berupa lembar balik dalam pelayanan kontrasepsi The use of decision making aids (ABPK) with flip chart form in contraceptive service wasdipandang kurang praktis. seen as less practical.Kemajuan teknologi memungkinkan penggunaan aplikasi dalam berbagai keperluan termasuk pelayanan kesehatan. The advance of technology allows the use of applications in various purposes including health services.Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui m odel k riteria k elayakan m edis p enggunaan k ontrasepsi b erbasis a plikasi. The purpose of this study was to determine the Application-based Medical Eligibility Criteria Model of Contraceptive Use.Jenis penelitian ini adalah research and development . This study was research and development (RnD). Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah bidan yang melakukan praktik mandiri di Kota Padang yang diambil secara purposive sampling .The population in this study were midwives in independent practice in Padang, with purposive sampling technique. Data dianalisis secara kualitatif dan kuantitatifData were analyzed qualitatively and quantitativelyuntuk to determine the respondent’stingkat level ofkepuasan satisfactionresponden teabout theaplikasi . application based model.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sebagian responden meng harapkan ABPK lebih The results showed that most respondents expected the decision making aids to be simple, systematic, not in “back and forth” form and pictures included. Hasil uji preliminary field testing menunjukkan bahwa 56,2% responden memiliki tingkat kepuasan yang tinggi terhadap aplikasi.The results of the preliminary field testing showed that 56.2% of respondents performed high level of satisfaction about the application-based model.Pada main product revision , dilakukan perbaikan dengan penambahan informasi dan gambar tentang metode kontrasepsi. In main product revision, improvements were made by adding information and images about contraceptive methods. PenelitianThis researchini invent the design of application based medical eligibility model of contraceptive use titled “Application of Clinical Decision Making System of Contraceptive Use”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Health Science→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→