MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997801669 · doi:10.1113/jp278889

Cerebral metabolism, oxidation and inflammation in severe passive hyperthermia with and without respiratory alkalosis

2020· article· en· W2997801669 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony R. Bain, Ryan L. Hoiland, Joseph E. Donnelly, Daniela Nowak‐Flück, Mypinder S. Sekhon, Michael M. Tymko, Jared J. Greiner, Christopher A. DeSouza, Philip N. Ainslie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaInterior HealthUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsRespiratory alkalosisInflammationHyperthermiaRespiratory systemMedicineAlkalosisMetabolismCardiologyAnesthesiaInternal medicineAcidosisMetabolic acidosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key points It was unknown whether respiratory alkalosis impacts the global cerebral metabolic response as well as the cerebral pro‐oxidation and inflammatory response in passive hyperthermia. This study demonstrated that the cerebral metabolic rate was increased by ∼20% with passive hyperthermia of up to +2°C oesophageal temperature, and this response was unaffected by respiratory alkalosis. Additionally, the increase in cerebral metabolism did not significantly impact the net cerebral release of oxidative and inflammatory markers. These data indicate that passive heating of up to +2°C core temperature in healthy young men is not enough to confer a major oxidative and inflammatory burden on the brain, but it does markedly increase the cerebral metabolic rate, independently of . Abstract There is limited information concerning the impact of arterial /pH on heat‐induced alteration in cerebral metabolism, as well as on the cerebral oxidative/inflammatory burden of hyperthermia. Accordingly, we sought to address two hypotheses: (1) passive hyperthermia will increase the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO 2 ) consistent with a combined influence of Q10 and respiratory alkalosis; and (2) the net cerebral release of pro‐oxidative and pro‐inflammatory markers will be elevated in hyperthermia, particularly in poikilocapnic hyperthermia. Healthy young men ( n = 6) underwent passive heating until an oesophageal temperature of 2°C above resting was reached. At 0.5°C increments in core temperature, CMRO 2 was calculated from the product of cerebral blood flow (ultrasound) and the radial artery–jugular venous oxygen content difference (cannulation). Net cerebral glucose/lactate exchange, and biomarkers of oxidative and inflammatory stress were also measured. At +2.0°C oesophageal temperature, arterial was restored to normothermic values using end‐tidal forcing. The primary findings were: (1) while CMRO 2 was increased ( P < 0.05) by ∼20% with hyperthermia of +1.5–2.0°C, this was not influenced by respiratory alkalosis, and (2) although biomarkers of pro‐oxidation and pro‐inflammation were systemically elevated in hyperthermia ( P < 0.05), there were no differences in the trans‐cerebral exchange kinetics. These novel data indicate that passive heating of up to +2°C core temperature in healthy young men is not enough to confer a major oxidative and inflammatory burden on the brain, despite it markedly increasing CMRO 2 , irrespective of arterial pH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207