MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998019734 · doi:10.1520/gtj20180357

Effect of Different Modes of Lateral Boundary Constraints of the Direct Simple Shear (DSS) Device under Monotonic and Cyclic Shear Loading

2019· article· en· W2998019734 on OpenAlexaff
Priyesh Verma, Dharma Wijewickreme

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotechnical Testing Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonotonic functionSimple shearShear (geology)Geotechnical engineeringGeologyBoundary (topology)Materials scienceStructural engineeringMathematicsEngineeringMathematical analysisPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The direct simple shear (DSS) device is commonly employed to characterize the shear behavior of soil while representing a plane strain condition. In DSS devices that use cylindrical specimens, the plane strain condition is mimicked by constraining the lateral boundaries of the specimen against radial deformations during consolidation and shear loading. The current test standard recommends using either wire-reinforced rubber membrane or unreinforced rubber membrane enclosed with stacked rigid rings as suitable modes of confinement to constrain the lateral boundaries of DSS test specimens. Only limited studies have been performed to assess the effects arising because of these different ways of lateral boundary constraints on the test results, particularly when DSS tests are conducted at relatively higher vertical effective confining stress (σ′v0) levels. An experimental program was undertaken to study the effect of lateral boundary constraint mode during constant-volume monotonic and cyclic DSS tests. The constant-volume tests were conducted on reconstituted cylindrical DSS specimens prepared from a natural silty soil under the following three modes of lateral boundary constraints: (a) steel wire–reinforced rubber membrane only (Mode 1); (b) steel wire–reinforced rubber membrane enclosed with a set of thin, low-friction stacked rigid rings (Mode 2); and (c) unreinforced rubber membrane enclosed with a set of thin, low-friction stacked rigid rings (Mode 3). The findings from these tests, conducted on specimens initially consolidated to σ′v0 level up to 900 kPa, indicate that there was no significant difference in the shear response derived from the three cases of lateral boundary constraints. This suggests that the commonly used approach of simply confining the DSS test specimen using steel wire–reinforced rubber membrane alone (i.e., Mode 1) would be effective and adequate for use in monotonic and cyclic direct simple shear testing, for σ′v0 ≤ 900 kPa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeotechnical Testing JournalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207