MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998097653 · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.46

Potential role of the compound Eucommia bone tonic granules in patients with osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis: A retrospective study

2020· article· en· W2998097653 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Clinical Cases · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Joint Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityShandong University
KeywordsMedicineMeloxicamOsteoarthritisRheumatoid arthritisWOMACInternal medicineCreatininePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis is a major source of pain, disability, and socioeconomic cost worldwide. Osteonecrosis is a disabling disorder that frequently occurs in the younger population aged from 20-50 years. The compound Eucommia bone tonic granules, a traditional Chinese medicine, can alleviate the damage of osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis. AIM: To investigate the potential role of the compound Eucommia bone tonic granules (Eucommia) in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis. METHODS: One-hundred forty osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis cases admitted to our hospital from January 2013 to December 2017 were selected. Patients were divided into two groups: Eucommia-meloxicam group and meloxicam group. Clinical efficacy and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score were evaluated according to the evaluation criteria of orthopedic diseases. The levels of bone-GLA protein, interleukin-17, recombinant human S100 calcium binding protein A12, sphingosine 1-phosphate, cystatin C, creatinine, and hemoglobin in peripheral blood were determined. RESULTS: The total effective rate in the two osteoarthritis groups was not different, but the total effective rate in the two osteonecrosis groups was significantly different. The overall efficacy of Eucommia-meloxicam group was superior to that of the meloxicam group. WOMAC showed that pain, stiffness, and dysfunction in the two groups of osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis before and after treatment were significantly different. The concentration of recombinant human S100 calcium binding protein A12, sphingosine 1-phosphate, cystatin C, creatinine, and hemoglobin before and after treatment in the Eucommia-meloxicam group and meloxicam group of osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis were significantly different, and the two treatment groups were significantly different from each other for osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that Eucommia can effectively enhance the curative effect of meloxicam, and the combination of Eucommia and meloxicam is superior to meloxicam alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it