MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998097653 · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.46

Potential role of the compound Eucommia bone tonic granules in patients with osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis: A retrospective study

2020· article· en· W2998097653 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
HU Cheng-xia, Keyao Hu, Jianfeng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Clinical Cases · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Joint Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityShandong University
KeywordsMedicineMeloxicamOsteoarthritisRheumatoid arthritisWOMACInternal medicineCreatininePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis is a major source of pain, disability, and socioeconomic cost worldwide. Osteonecrosis is a disabling disorder that frequently occurs in the younger population aged from 20-50 years. The compound Eucommia bone tonic granules, a traditional Chinese medicine, can alleviate the damage of osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis. AIM: To investigate the potential role of the compound Eucommia bone tonic granules (Eucommia) in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis. METHODS: One-hundred forty osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis cases admitted to our hospital from January 2013 to December 2017 were selected. Patients were divided into two groups: Eucommia-meloxicam group and meloxicam group. Clinical efficacy and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score were evaluated according to the evaluation criteria of orthopedic diseases. The levels of bone-GLA protein, interleukin-17, recombinant human S100 calcium binding protein A12, sphingosine 1-phosphate, cystatin C, creatinine, and hemoglobin in peripheral blood were determined. RESULTS: The total effective rate in the two osteoarthritis groups was not different, but the total effective rate in the two osteonecrosis groups was significantly different. The overall efficacy of Eucommia-meloxicam group was superior to that of the meloxicam group. WOMAC showed that pain, stiffness, and dysfunction in the two groups of osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis before and after treatment were significantly different. The concentration of recombinant human S100 calcium binding protein A12, sphingosine 1-phosphate, cystatin C, creatinine, and hemoglobin before and after treatment in the Eucommia-meloxicam group and meloxicam group of osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis were significantly different, and the two treatment groups were significantly different from each other for osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that Eucommia can effectively enhance the curative effect of meloxicam, and the combination of Eucommia and meloxicam is superior to meloxicam alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Clinical CasesSame topicBone and Joint DiseasesFrench-language works237,207