Coexpression of Human Hepatic Uridine Diphosphate Glucuronosyltransferase Proteins: Implications for Ontogenetic Mechanisms and Isoform Coregulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) catalyze glucuronidation to facilitate systemic and local clearance of numerous chemicals and drugs. To investigate whether UGT expression is coregulated in human liver, we analyzed the protein expression of UGTs 1A1, 1A3, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, 2B7, 3A1, and 3A2 using western blots from 164 healthy human liver samples, comparing expression with age and sex. UGT1A6 levels were significantly higher in children than adults, and UGT3A1 and 3A2 expression significantly increased with age from childhood to age >65 yearas. In children aged <18 years, UGT1A4/1A9 protein expression was significantly correlated, but not for adults aged >18 years. UGT1A3 expression was always significantly correlated with other UGT1A isoforms in all adults aged >18 years. In individuals aged ≥12 years, expression of UGT1A1/1A4, UGT1A1/1A6, UGT1A1/1A9, and UGT1A4/1A6 significantly correlated, which was not observed in children aged <12 years. In contrast, UGT1A4/2B7 showed significant correlation in children aged <12 years, but not in individuals aged ≥12 years, and this was observed in female but not male individuals. Expression of UGT1A6/1A9 and UGT3A1/3A2 correlated in the entire sample population, but UGT3As did not correlate with other UGTs. These correlations were sex dependent, as UGT1A3/1A1, UGT1A4/2B7 and UGT3A1/3A2 correlated more highly in male than female individuals, while UGT1A4/1A6 protein correlated more significantly in female than male individuals. This is the first report on the ontogeny of UGT3A isoforms, showing maximal expression in the elderly, and is the first demonstration that UGT isoforms commonly coexpress in vivo, in both age-dependent and sex-dependent manners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".