The Vaccination against Smallpox in Russia in the First Quarter of the 19th Century: Documents from the St. Petersburg and Moscow Gubernias
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Vaccination against Smallpox in Russia in the First Quarter of the 19th Century: Documents from the The article is devoted to the initial period in the history of vaccination against smallpox in Russia. Since 1811, vaccination against smallpox became nationwide, however, its effectiveness varied from gubernia to gubernia. Modern scientific literature focuses on anti-epidemic activities of the 2nd half of the 19th century. One of the little-studied subjects is the vaccination against smallpox in the St. Petersburg and Moscow gubernias in the 1st quarter of the 19th century. For a long time, smallpox was one of the major factors of mortality in Russia. The study of the organization of vaccination in 1811 -1820 in the St. Petersburg and Moscow gubernias, which had a special status, is important for comprehensive analysis of the development of national medicine and identification of major factors in gradual change in measures of mortality. The source base is reports sent to the Ministry of Internal Affairs by the Moscow civil governor and St. Petersburg medical board (Physicut), as well as reports of the uezd doctors. These documents are being thus introduced into scientific use. Statistical methods for processing mass sources are applied and relational databases created. The article discusses absolute and relative indicators characterizing the success of vaccination in each gubernia and characterizes the organization of the smallpox vaccination: its regularity, equal distribution in the uezds, personnel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it