MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998194662 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v46i01a05

National Influenza Mid-Season Report, 2019–2020

2020· article· en· W2998194662 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Claire Sevenhuysen, Liza Lee, Andrea Nwosu, Tiffany Smith, Lindsay Whitmore, Nathalie Bastien, Mireille Desroches, Christina Bancej

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of Canada
FundersPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsSeasonal influenzaInfluenza seasonMedicineVirologyInfluenza A virusVirusInfluenza vaccineHuman mortality from H5N1Flu seasonVaccinationDemographyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Internal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada's national influenza season started in week 47 between November 17 to 23, 2019. Of the 3,762 laboratory-confirmed influenza detections reported from August 25 to December 14, 2019, 61% were influenza A, and of those subtyped, 68% were A(H3N2). Influenza B detections are above average for this time of year. Indicators of influenza activity are within the expected range for this time of year. The majority of hospitalizations reported by provinces and territories have been associated with influenza A(H3N2) (76%), and the greatest proportion have been among adults 65 years and older (40%). Among sentinel pediatric influenza hospitalizations, 55% were associated with influenza B and the majority have been under five years of age (63%). Antigenic and genetic characterization results to date suggest that the majority of circulating A(H3N2) and B viruses are not similar to the virus components recommended for use in the 2019-2020 seasonal influenza vaccines and that the majority of circulating A(H1N1) viruses are similar to the vaccine reference strains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207