MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998494509 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2019.2963344

Switched Capacitor Integrated (2<i>n</i> + 1)-Level Step-Up Single-Phase Inverter

2019· article· en· W2998494509 on OpenAlexaff
Md Noman Habib Khan, Mojtaba Forouzesh, Yam P. Siwakoti, Li Li, Frede Blaabjerg

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverterCapacitorGrid-tie inverterTopology (electrical circuits)VoltageInrush currentSwitched capacitorElectronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringMaximum power point tracking

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a novel switched capacitor (SC) based (2n + 1)-level single-phase inverter with a reduced number of components and input dc voltage supply. This inverter is designed in a way that just one dc source is required to generate different voltage levels. The circuit consists of three major parts, i.e., front-end boost stage, active SC cell(s) in the middle, and H-bridge inverter at the end. The total number of output voltage levels is up to (2n + 1) levels, where n ≥ 2 is the number of switching cells, which consists of three active switches and two capacitors. Compared with conventional SC-based multilevel inverter topologies, the proposed topology features many advantages, such as low number of semiconductor devices, quasi-resonant charging of capacitors that reduce the inrush current and current stress on the devices, self-balancing of capacitor, and reduced voltage stress on the switches. Moreover, a simple sinusoidal pulsewidth modulation technique is employed here to generate the modulation signals for the proposed inverter. The operating principle is presented in detail followed by comparative analysis, thermal modeling, and design guidelines. Finally, computer simulation and laboratory test results are carried out for a five-level inverter with one SC cells as well as a seven-level inverter with two SC cells as two examples to verify the performance of the proposed (2n + 1)-level inverter. Measurement results show that the proposed inverter has the 96.5 ± 1% efficiency over a wide range of load with a peak efficiency of 98.56%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations120
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207