Fontan‐Associated Liver Disease: Spectrum of Disease in Children and Adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Information is evolving on liver disease in pediatric patients with Fontan physiology. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the spectrum of liver disease in a pediatric population of patients with Fontan physiology and evaluate transient elastography ( TE ) as a noninvasive marker of liver disease. Methods and Results We prospectively enrolled all children with Fontan physiology. All patients underwent comprehensive liver evaluation including liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma‐glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase), aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index, albumin, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, complete blood cell count, abdominal ultrasound, and TE . Transjugular liver biopsies and hemodynamic measurements were performed in a subset of patients. A total of 76 children (median, 11.7; interquartile range, 8.4–14.8 [56% male]) were evaluated, with 17 having a transjugular liver biopsy (median 14.8 years; interquartile range, 14.3–17.4). All biopsies showed pathological changes. The severity of liver pathology did not correlate with TE . There was a positive correlation between TE and time since Fontan ( R =0.42, P <0.01), aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index ( R =0.29, P =0.02), aspartate transaminase ( R =−0.42, P <0.01), and platelets ( R =−0.42, P <0.01). Splenomegaly on abdominal ultrasound was correlated with TE ( z =−2.2, P =0.03), low platelet count ( z =1.9, P =0.05), low aspartate transaminase ( z =1.9, P =0.02), and low alkaline phosphatase ( z =2.4, P =0.02). Conclusions Liver disease was ubiquitous in our cohort of pediatric patients with Fontan Physiology. Given the correlation between TE and time from Fontan, TE shows potential as a prospective marker of liver pathology. However, individual measurements with TE do not correlate with the severity of pathology. Given the prevalence of liver disease in this population, protective measures of liver health as well as routine liver health surveillance should be implemented with consideration for hepatology consultation and biopsy in the event of abnormal liver biochemical markers or imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".