MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998745965 · doi:10.1096/fj.201901202rr

Inhibition of Ca <sup>2+</sup> channel surface expression by mutant bestrophin‐1 in RPE cells

2020· article· en· W2998745965 on OpenAlexaff
Magdalena Cordes, Piotr Bucichowski, Ahmad Samir Alfaar, Stephen H. Tsang, Seba Almedawar, Nadine Reichhart, Olaf Strauß

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsMutantRetinal pigment epitheliumCell biologyTransfectionCav1.2ChemistryHEK 293 cellsRetinalIntracellularMolecular biologyBiologyBiochemistryGeneProtein subunit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The BEST1 gene product bestrophin‐1, a Ca 2+ ‐dependent anion channel, interacts with Ca V 1.3 Ca 2+ channels in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). BEST1 mutations lead to Best vitelliform macular dystrophy. A common functional defect of these mutations is reduced trafficking of bestrophin‐1 into the plasma membrane. We hypothesized that this defect affects the interaction partner Ca V 1.3 channel affecting Ca 2+ signaling and altered RPE function. Thus, we investigated the protein interaction between Ca V 1.3 channels and bestrophin‐1 by immunoprecipitation, Ca V 1.3 activity in the presence of mutant bestrophin‐1 and intracellular trafficking of the interaction partners in confluent RPE monolayers. We selected four BEST1 mutations, each representing one mutational hotspot of the disease: T6P, F80L, R218C, and F305S. Heterologously expressed L‐type channels and mutant bestrophin‐1 showed reduced interaction, reduced Ca V 1.3 channel activity, and changes in surface expression. Transfection of polarized RPE (porcine primary cells, iPSC‐RPE) that endogenously express Ca V 1.3 and wild‐type bestrophin‐1, with mutant bestrophin‐1 confirmed reduction of Ca V 1.3 surface expression. For the four selected BEST1 mutations, presence of mutant bestrophin‐1 led to reduced Ca V 1.3 activity by modulating pore‐function or decreasing surface expression. Reduced Ca V 1.3 activity might open new ways to understand symptoms of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy such as reduced electro‐oculogram, lipofuscin accumulation, and vision impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207