P545 Deep remission assessed by endoscopy, magnetic resonance or intestinal ultrasound, in refractory Crohn’s disease patients in clinical remission with ustekinumab: a real-life single-centre experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Current therapeutic goals in Crohn’s disease (CD) include not only the mere absence of symptoms but also the objective resolution of macroscopic lesions, so-called deep remission (DR), which has been related to better outcomes. DR is usually acknowledged by endoscopy, although magnetic resonance (MR) or intestinal ultrasound (IUS) are also reliable, provide extramucosal information and may be more appropriate in certain clinical scenarios. Data regarding the achievement of DR with ustekinumab in real-life clinical practice is still scarce. Methods Retrospective cohort study carried out in a tertiary hospital between April 2017 and April 2019 including patients who had clinically active CD (Harvey–Bradshaw index [HBI] ≥ 4) objectively assessed by either endoscopy, MR or IUS; received intravenous induction with ustekinumab, had achieved clinical remission and had treatment response assessed by either endoscopy, MR or IUS. DR was defined by SES-CD 0–3 or Rutgeerts index i0 if endoscopically assessed, or by complete normalisation of inflammatory parameters on cross-sectional imaging. Endoscopic response was defined by the decrease of SES-CD of 50% compared with baseline. Radiographic response was defined by improvement in bowel wall thickness, inflammatory fat, mural blood flow and hyperenhancement compared with baseline imaging by physician global assessment. Demographics, clinical data and information regarding ustekinumab treatment were collected. Results 90 patients treated with ustekinumab at our centre were analyzed, but only 28 met inclusion criteria (14(50%) female; median age 45 (43–50)) with a median follow-up of 19 (IQR: 15–23) months. All of them had previously failed to antiTNFα and 20 (71%) failed to ≥2 biologics. Treatment response assessment was made by endoscopy (22 cases; 79%) or cross-sectional imaging technique (6 cases; 21%) in a median time of 10 months (IQR: 7–13) from the start of treatment. Deep remission was achieved in 18 (64%) patients. Endoscopic response was achieved in 5 (18%) additional patients. Five (18%) remaining patients obtained no objective response to ustekinumab despite being in clinical remission. Patients who had received prior treatment with ≥2 biologics or those classified as B2 or B3 according to Montreal Classification were less likely to achieve deep remission, although those associations did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion In our experience, a majority of refractory CD patients who achieved clinical remission with ustekinumab also reached deep remission assessed by either endoscopy, MR or IUS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".