Stiffness and strength anisotropy of overconsolidated Bootlegger Cove clays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the evaluation of the stiffness and strength anisotropy of overconsolidated (OC) Bootlegger Cove Formation (BCF) clays at the Port of Alaska, formerly known as the Port of Anchorage. The stiffness and strength anisotropic material response was evaluated based on triaxial samples equipped with internal instrumentation including a submersible load cell and three subminiature linear variable displacement transducers (LVDTs). Three sets of bender elements were used in this research to measure shear wave velocities for different propagation and polarization directions. The effects of reproducing the stress history of the soil deposit on the stiffness cross-anisotropic behavior of the material are discussed. The laboratory test results are compared with in situ measurements of shear wave velocities based on suspension logging and crosshole and downhole soundings. The results of the experimental program showed that BCF clay is a cross-anisotropic material. Mean stiffness anisotropy ratios ranged from 0.90 to 1.22 and 0.93 to 1.46 for lightly OC and OC conditions, respectively. Strength anisotropy ratios, defined as the ratio of undrained shear strength under triaxial extension to compression, varied between 0.8 and 0.5. It is found that reproducing the stress history of the OC soil deposit during the laboratory reconsolidation stage did not have a significant impact on the initial stiffness anisotropy ratios of the BCF clay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".