MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

3D Printing of Vascular Tubes Using Bioelastomer Prepolymers by Freeform Reversible Embedding

2020· article· en· W2998807817 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMaterials sciencePolymerSelf-healing hydrogelsPolyesterTissue engineeringPrepolymerComposite materialUltimate tensile strengthBiomedical engineeringNanotechnologyPolymer chemistryPolyurethane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bioelastomers have been extensively used in tissue engineering applications because of favorable mechanical stability, tunable properties, and chemical versatility. As these materials generally possess low elastic modulus and relatively long gelation time, it is challenging to 3D print them using traditional techniques. Instead, the field of 3D printing has focused preferentially on hydrogels and rigid polyester materials. To develop a versatile approach for 3D printing of elastomers, we used freeform reversible embedding of suspended prepolymers. A family of novel fast photocrosslinakble bioelastomer prepolymers were synthesized from dimethyl itaconate, 1,8-octanediol, and triethyl citrate. Tensile testing confirmed their elastic properties with Young's moduli in the range of 11-53 kPa. These materials supported cultivation of viable cells and enabled adhesion and proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Tubular structures were created by embedding the 3D printed microtubes within a secondary hydrogel that served as a temporary support. Upon photocrosslinking and porogen leaching, the polymers were permeable to small molecules (TRITC-dextran). The polymer microtubes were assembled on the 96-well plates custom made by hot-embossing, as a tool to connect multiple organs-on-a-chip. The endothelialization of the tubes was performed to confirm that these microtubes can be utilized as vascular tubes to support parenchymal tissues seeded on them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it