MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2998900474 · doi:10.11575/prism/37470

Characterization of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and Host Cytokine Patterns in a Multiethnic Cohort of Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)

2020· dissertation· en· W2998900474 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aaron Lucko

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFatty liverMedicineChronic hepatitisHepatitis B virusAlcoholic liver diseaseVirologyImmunologyHepatitis BDiseaseCohortChronic liver diseaseVirusGastroenterologyInternal medicineCirrhosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies have reported conflicting data on the relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to identify how metabolic factors associated with NAFLD (diabetes, hypertension, central obesity and dyslipidemia) affects the hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with CHB. Patients with CHB and NAFLD were prospectively enrolled from 3 Canadian liver clinics. Patients underwent standardized liver tests (liver stiffness measurement [LSM] by transient elastography, controlled attenuation parameter [CAP]) and HBV clinical tests (quantitative [q] HBV surface antigen [HBsAg], HBeAg). Plasma levels of HBV DNA and RNA were measured by quantitative (q)PCR. Viral genotype was identified by population and next generation sequencing of the precore (C)/C and presurface (S)/S genes and analyzed using MEGA 7. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were stimulated ex vivo for 72h by HBV core antigen (HBcAg) or HBsAg peptides. PBMC supernatant and serum were analyzed for cytokine/chemokine markers using a 13-plex immunoassay. Kruskal-Wallis, multiple linear regression, Chi-square, and Fischer’s exact tests were performed using R commander. Of 48 subjects enrolled (median age 44.5 [IQR 16.8]), most were male (n=31), of Asian descent (n=29), and HBeAg negative (n=45). In HBeAg negative patients, the mean CAP was 30652 dB/m, ALT was 4026 IU/mL, and LSM was 5.82.0 kPa, indicating high steatosis without fibrosis. In all patients, the HBV genotypes were 13% A, 16% B, 46% C, 17% D, 6% E. Mutations associated with severe liver disease, anti-viral drug resistance, immune escape, and HBeAg negativity were identified in all subjects. Obese patients had increased qHBsAg levels, while diabetic patients had increased S gene diversity. Hepatic steatosis severity did not relate to viral factors analyzed. Ex vivo PBMC responses to HBcAg or HBsAg stimulation were not different to unstimulated controls. In this study, a multi-ethnic cohort of CHB and NAFLD patients were prospectively evaluated with novel virologic and host immunological markers. We found that metabolic factors associated with NAFLD correlated to inflammatory cytokine levels, viral genetic characteristics, and HBV replication markers. These viral and host factors can influence the risk of liver disease progression in patients with both NAFLD and CHB, warranting further study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→