Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is a pleasure to guest edit this special edition of Critical Social Work. The process of reviewing the thoughtful works of diverse contributors reminds me that we are in a time of incredible shifts, changes, opportunities, and uncertain futures. Aboriginal people in Canada are facing multiple challenges to treaties, land rights, and funding at all levels, while, paradoxically, we experience unprecedented opportunities in politics, business, education, and economic and social development. Hence, this edition illustrates that there is no “single story” (Chimamanda Adichie,TED Talks) that articulates the Aboriginal experience. The articles comprising this edition indicate that our attentions, as Aboriginal social work educators, practitioners and students, are invested in diverse directions, and we are concerned with many issues, historical and contemporary, that intersect and interface. I’m so pleased to present a small but robust collection of articles attending to contemporary social work issues and it is promising that several of these articles are written by Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal social work students who are sturdy allies who are invested in Aboriginal issues. In many Indigenous cultures, artistic expression is a medium through which traditional knowledge, culture and worldview are disseminated and contemporarily, artistic media have astonishing ways of making painful subjects more palatable. Therefore, I am pleased to include a work of fiction and two works of prose which highlight pressing concerns via creative mediums.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.068 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".