MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998975631 · doi:10.2208/jscejseee.76.1_67

THE LIMIT STATES COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ESTIMATION FOR SIMPLE STIFFENED PLATE WITH LARGE ASPECT RATIO

2020· article· en· W2998975631 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yasuhiro Miyazaki, Mahmudur Rahman, Yoshiaki Okui

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser A1 (Structural Engineering & Earthquake Engineering (SE/EE)) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimple (philosophy)Limit (mathematics)Compressive strengthAspect ratio (aeronautics)Structural engineeringMathematicsMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite materialMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

幅が狭い箱桁等に用いられる単リブ補剛板の圧縮強度を,実験および数値計算結果から検討した.まず,橋梁用高降伏点鋼板SBHS500と普通鋼板SM490Y製の単リブ補剛板4枚で構成される矩形短柱の圧縮実験を4ケース実施し,圧縮強度特性および荷重-面外変位関係などを明らかにした.この実験供試体では初期不整も併せて計測し,計測結果および圧縮試験結果を用いて非線形有限要素モデルの検証を行い,十分な精度で解析可能なことを確認した.つぎに,初期不整と幅厚比パラメータをパラメトリックに変化させた解析モデルを用いて,確率論的手法による単リブ補剛板の圧縮強度特性を明確にした.最後に,これらの結果から単リブ補剛板の終局限界強度および使用限界強度を,道路橋示方書,AASHTO, Canadian CodeおよびEurocodeと比較しながら提案している.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser A1 (Structural Engineering & Earthquake Engineering (SE/EE))Same topicStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207